

Quantifying model performance
Quality of replicating portfolio is used to measure performance of a model
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE PDF
To assess the performance of a model, practitioners often use the so-called P&L Explain, which measures whether portfolio price movements can be explained using changes in risk factors and corresponding sensitivities. This criterion can be misleading when assessing the performance of a model. Alexandre Antonov, Jan Baldeaux and Rajiv Sesodia introduce a new metric, a backward-looking criterion, based on the same replication arguments used in no-arbitrage derivatives
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
More on Banking
Risk management
Union beckons for the three quant tribes
Studies may be deferred, but future for grads is bright, argues UBS’s Gordon Lee
Receive this by email