Stress-testing – Special report 2019

The surge of supervisory stress-testing that began after the 2007–08 financial crisis had a clear purpose: to identify banks in danger of imminent distress and reassure the market that those still standing were solvent and could survive the downturn.

More than a decade later, issuance costs for bank debt could hardly be lower – even for subordinated bonds. That suggests a level of confidence among investors that they understand the risks in the banking sector. However, bankers say the data demands from regulatory stress-testing are, if anything, becoming more intense

Increasingly, regulators seem to see the stress-testing exercise more as a way to identify process failures rather than balance sheet risks. And banks see them as a capital constraint that is misaligned with the Basel risk-based ratios, or even just as an extra layer of bureaucracy. The annual round of regulatory stress-test results is in danger of becoming an expensive circus that doesn’t specifically reduce risk in the system – especially if, as Risk.net uncovered recently, banks are gaming the results. 

If the concern is that banks are modelling and assessing risk incorrectly, then perhaps a more valuable use of supervisors’ time and resources would be to deploy their challenger models directly to the Basel framework. The Fed already does this for stress-test outputs. Regulators can then step up scrutiny of those banks with model outputs that deviate a long way from the challenger, rather than imposing a stress test for all risks on all banks. 

Download the full 2019 Stress-testing special report in PDF format

  • LinkedIn  
  • Save this article
  • Print this page  
Banks seek new value for their efforts

As regulatory stress tests evolve and a new age of stress-testing approaches, firms are looking to maximise value by making the most of scenario-based analytics. John Voigt, principal solutions manager at SAS, explores the importance to institutions of…

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: