Study casts doubt on mandatory futures insurance

Security padlock image
FCM implosions have sparked calls for better protection

A mandatory insurance fund designed to protect customers from a futures commission merchant (FCM) bankruptcy would be very costly to implement, but a voluntary solution in which FCMs banded together to form a captive insurer might be feasible, according to a recent industry-sponsored study.

The study was commissioned after two high-profile FCM failures, the 2011 collapse of New York-based MF Global and the 2012 failure of Iowa-based Peregrine Financial Group. The implosions sparked calls for a

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: