Why Basel's not faulty

Some government representatives have suggested that Basel II should be abandoned because it is pro-cyclical, i.e. it requires banks to hold more capital in bad times thereby exacerbating any credit crunch. This suggestion may be a sensible view if the plan is to replace bank capital with government ownership, but otherwise it requires a more considered analysis.

In essence, the Basel II Accords say that the amount of capital should be proportional to the risk of the bank. Clearly this is better

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

If you already have an account, please sign in here.


Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here