Why Basel's not faulty

Some government representatives have suggested that Basel II should be abandoned because it is pro-cyclical, i.e. it requires banks to hold more capital in bad times thereby exacerbating any credit crunch. This suggestion may be a sensible view if the plan is to replace bank capital with government ownership, but otherwise it requires a more considered analysis.

In essence, the Basel II Accords say that the amount of capital should be proportional to the risk of the bank. Clearly this is better

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: