UK regulator outlines wish list for Solvency II review

Risk margin “highly pro-cyclical” and ultimate forward rate “completely unrealistic”, says financial policy director

The PRA has several criticisms of Solvency II. Photo: Shutterstock/Gustavo Frazao

The UK’s Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has criticised key aspects of Solvency II, including the ultimate forward rate (UFR) at 4.2%, the dynamic version of the volatility adjustment (VA) allowed in most European countries, and the sensitivity of the risk margin to changes in interest rates, hinting at where the regulator might push for change in the 2018 review of the directive.

Victoria Saporta, financial policy director at the PRA, who spoke at a Solvency II conference hosted by

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: