MetLife puts forward alternative approach to G-Sii designation

NTNI definition could be dropped from G-Sii assessment and replaced by liquidity measures, says insurer

MetLife building in New York
MetLife has proposed fundamental revisions to designation process

US insurer MetLife has criticised two consultation papers from the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS), calling for fundamental revisions to the methodology for designating global systemically important insurers (G-Siis) and the definition of so-called non-traditional non-insurance activity (NTNI).

Going beyond criticising existing plans, MetLife has proposed alternatives it says better reflect the systemic threat insurers pose. This includes removing NTNI activity from

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: