
Internal model should not be mandatory for VA business – MetLife
Internal model should not be mandatory for VA business – MetLife

Writers of variable annuity (VA) products in Europe should not be required to use an internal model - as proposed in a recent paper by European regulators - when determining capital requirements, according to the European arm of US insurer MetLife.
The Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors' (Ceiops) consultation paper 83, released in November last year and recently closed for industry comment, argued that the particular nature of VA business meant that an approach
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
More on Insurance
Regulation
ECB grants post-Brexit reprieve on large exposures limit
Exemption for intra-group exposures to UK will be preserved pending a decision on equivalence
Receive this by email