Botched legal work in BT privatisation responsible for potential £23 billion pension liability for UK taxpayers

bt-centre

A failure to define what was meant by the term ‘liability' by lawyers constructing the agreement for the UK government's 1984 privatisation of telecoms group BT is the reason why the UK taxpayer has been left with a potential £23 billion bill following last week's high court ruling.

In order to protect the pensions of employees, the government gave a guarantee that it would stand behind BT's pension obligations, and the scheme's trustees sought to clarify whether this covered all the obligations

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: