Best specialist FoHF under $500m over three years: Ayaltis Narrapuno Spectrum

Spectrum fund profits from exposure to credit via market-neutral equities

hao-shao-ayaltis-hfr1215
Hao Shao, Ayaltis

Hedge Funds Review European Fund of Hedge Funds Awards 2015

"Investors are behaving like deer in front of the headlights. They don't know where to go. They know that bonds are dangerous… They know that equities are erratic," says Ernesto Prado, chief investment officer at Ayaltis. The solution, he thinks, is exposure to the credit market through liquid, equity market-neutral positions.

The firm's Narrapuno Spectrum fund won best specialist fund of hedge funds (FoHF) under $500 million over three years at the Hedge Funds Review European Fund of Hedge Funds Awards. Prado describes the fund as "our best of class product", because it contains managers in whom Ayaltis has the highest conviction. It aims to give its investors absolute returns and offers quarterly liquidity.

Prado contrasts the present macro backdrop with that in the wake of the 2008 crisis. Then, investors had to commit to hold undervalued assets as the economy recovered. "Today is a very different cycle. All the deep value opportunities are no longer there," he says. Assets are now too highly priced, but he believes mispricing is rife.

Equities provide more opportunities for the FoHF than asset-backed securities and distressed bonds used to. Corporate bonds are too expensive and too many are investing in high-yield bonds that will soon prove "garbage", Prado says.

While others try to "squeeze basis points" from equities via momentum strategies, the Spectrum fund takes a contrary position. Prado illustrates this with two examples of equity managers that invest differently. Both depend on moments where central bankers lift the spirits of investors and trend-followers to the extent that equities become overvalued.

First is an event-driven passive activist fund – passive because it does not seek to pressure the company in the media or on shareholder boards. It shorts the stock of a cash-flow degenerative business when it appears overvalued; it then publishes a damning analysis of the firm's bad credit position and waits for a pricing correction. Small-cap equities are favoured over large caps, being easier to move.

The second is a systematic relative-value fund. It invests in a few thousand equities, long and short, in contrast to the event-driven fund, which invests in only a dozen or so. After a long market rally, it shorts companies with bad credit positions; after market jitters, it invests in cash-flow-generating companies at what it deems to be their nadir. The fund holds the positions until above share value.

The basis of both analyses is credit. With greater dispersion between equities than credit spreads, good and bad, the company gets its exposure to credit via equities.

"Generic macro managers who think they have a crystal ball are going to have their hands chopped," Prado says. Selecting good global macro funds requires "a lot of work, a lot of miles and a lot of expenses", he says half-gaily. Nonetheless opportunities abound, he thinks, particularly in the spreads between developed and emerging market debt.

"A small. positively correlated performance in 2016 will be worth gold. Why? Because China could have provoked a much more violent correction… we are in wealth-defending mode," he says. "This is not the year to be risking your house to outperform."

  • LinkedIn  
  • Save this article
  • Print this page  

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: