
Jumping on the smart beta bandwagon
An increase in sustainable investing and institutional investors are promoting smart beta investment strategies in Asia

Asia has been slow to embrace smart beta investment strategies, but this is beginning to change with an increase in sustainable investing and institutional investors in the region – such as insurers and pensions managers – looking to protect portfolios amid a strong run in equity markets.
The adoption of smart beta in Asia had lagged because of limited investment in building smart beta exchange-traded products, misaligned incentives or higher remuneration for brokers to promote other products and, until recently, a lack of investor knowledge. Most of these issues have now been addressed.
So far, the majority of smart beta exchange-traded fund (ETF) investors in Asia have been Japan- or Australia-based. Japan accounted for the largest share of assets under management (AUM) in smart beta ETFs, with $7.3 billion invested. Initiatives from Japan’s Government Pension Investment Fund (GPIF) and the Bank of Japan to encourage investors to increase their exposure to ETFs have contributed to these inflows. While smart beta ETF assets in Asia-Pacific including Japan grew by 57% in the year to June 2017, the asset class in the region represents only 4.3% of total ETF assets, which now stand at $390 billion, according to Morningstar.
The first smart beta index in China – the China Securities Index Company’s Research Affiliates Fundamental Index – was only launched in 2009. The first ETF based on it was released a year later – almost seven years after the first smart beta fund was launched in the US.
Interest is picking up, however – especially in China, where insurers are keen to jump on the bandwagon. This increasing interest in smart beta in Asia coincides with intensified demand for sustainable investing.
China is currently responsible for 30% of total global investment in renewable energy and 27% of investment in energy efficiency, according to the International Energy Agency. Furthermore, the GPIF is promoting engagement strategies to encourage shareholders to push companies towards more sustainable practices.
Investors are looking for index products with green exposures and ways to incorporate sustainability metrics alongside traditional financial ones.
One way smart beta has been used to incorporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing is through an ESG filter, overlaid onto a fund that assesses a number of factors. Although this reduces the investment universe, risk-monitoring tools can be used to ensure the performance of the fund.
However, those looking into smart beta and ESG in Asia must be conscious of not trying to replicate successful strategies elsewhere without accounting for regional differences. For example, ESG issues such as air pollution may be a more important consideration in Asia than in other regions.
Equally, features of less-developed markets – such as the large number of state‑owned enterprises in China – must be considered when putting together an effective smart beta strategy there.
Another factor generating demand is that smart beta decisions are essentially driven by data and enhanced with technology. As the two enablers advance, the execution of smart beta strategies becomes increasingly consistent and inexpensive from a fund management perspective. For fee-conscious Asian investors struggling with global falling returns, this provides an opportunity – rising interest in Asia coincides with a global surge. Smart beta ETFs accounted for about $430 billion, with new inflows of more than $45 billion recorded in 2016, according to Morningstar. Fund manager BlackRock predicts that total AUM in smart beta ETFs will grow to $1 trillion by 2020, and to $2.4 trillion by 2025.
Read more articles from the Smart Beta and Factor Investing Special Report
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Asset management
How Bloomberg got liquidity seekers to trust its machine learning models
Recent liquidity squeezes have proved the worth of advanced models, argues the tech giant. Now the task is to explain their inner workings to machine learning sceptics
Asset-liability management: Special report 2023
There is nothing new about the dynamics behind the asset-liability management (ALM) banking crisis of earlier this year: maturity transformation, liquidity risk and interest rate risk are at the heart of the traditional banking business model. But these…
How small and medium-sized banks can enhance deposits modelling frameworks
Recent events have called into question the reliability of deposits as a primary source of funding for small and medium-sized banks. Stickiness of deposits that generations of bankers had counted on suddenly seem ephemeral
ALM banking after the crisis: stress-testing for more robust liquidity management practices
A panel of industry experts discusses a new age of depositor behaviour and the expected evolution of regulations in the wake of the asset-liability management (ALM) banking crisis. They share insights on achieving integrated approaches to ALM, as well as…
Fleeting volatility vexes trend followers
Jumpy markets give quant firms the jitters as tried-and-tested strategies struggle in 2023
Chartis RiskTech Buyside50
The second annual RiskTech Buyside50 ranking from Chartis Research outlines notable trends in the buy side and ranks the key players operating within it, focusing on solutions, industry segments and the scope and breadth of investment lifecycle…
Hedge funds raise stakes in fight over dealer rule
Two prominent industry bodies file legal papers in key court case over SEC’s proposed extension of dealer definition
How Man Numeric found SVB red flags in credit data
Network analysis helps quant shop spot concentration and contagion risks