Why factor crowding fears are overblown

Factor investing has little impact on exposures, claims La Française Investment Solutions

The rush into factor investing strategies – today worth about $1 trillion – has raised concerns that alternative factors are becoming crowded, and therefore overpriced and more sensitive to dislocation events. Is this fear justified?

This article seeks to answer that question in relation to equity alternative premia, the best known and most popular premia. The arguments put forward are equally valid for premia in other asset classes.

We first return to fundamentals that underlie the existence

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: