Basel’s capital commitment, cross-border EU banking, euro swaps fix

The week on Risk.net, September 22–28, 2017

CAPITAL RULES may be too risk-sensitive, Basel fears

US AND JAPAN push for twin EU bank holdcos

EURO SWAPS MARKET plays catch-up in rates reform

 

COMMENTARY: Sticking with simplicity

Reforms such as the standardised measurement approach for operational risk capital have attracted criticism from the industry, but the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision is sticking to its guns. At the Asia Risk Congress in Singapore this week, deputy head Toshio Tsuiki worried publicly that capital rules might still be too risk-sensitive, and doubled down on the committee’s policy of looking for simple and standardised rules over more risk-sensitive approaches. He suggested the slow rollout of recent reforms showed there was still further to go in this direction. With a comprehensive regulatory review now underway at the Financial Stability Board (FSB), Tsuiki is also having to hold the line against the tendency of major jurisdictions to go their own way on financial regulation.

The Basel Committee has become so central to financial regulatory reform discussions that it is easy to forget it isn’t the only game in town. Capital adequacy rules have been in the spotlight for years, but – especially when it comes to preventing the kind of major collapse that would be involved in the spread of another financial crisis – it is not clear any realistic capital holding would be big enough to make a difference (Basel III levels almost certainly wouldn’t be). Regulators such as the CBRC’s Andrew Sheng doubt any reformed capital adequacy rules would do any better.

By focusing on simplicity, the Basel Committee may in fact be doing everyone a service, by making it obvious that capital levels alone have limited power and will not be enough to promote good behaviour among banks. That has to be up to individual national regulators, and international regulatory bodies such as the FSB, which have more tools at their command.

 

STAT OF THE WEEK

Clearing houses across Asia have seen a surge in volumes following the introduction of margining rules; LCH has seen a 37% growth in its SwapClear business, and Singapore Exchange has had record volumes, clearing $2.6 billion daily in US dollar CNH swaps. Asia clearing surge raises concerns of eligible collateral

 

QUOTE OF THE WEEK

“We’ve analysed social media data, but we haven’t found anything particularly useful” – Mark Webster, Acadian

 

 

  • LinkedIn  
  • Save this article
  • Print this page  

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: