Risk.net

Isda says S&P got it wrong with definitions criticism

Last week, S&P said it strongly objected to a change in language that would allow for the triggering of credit default swaps contracts where public information that “reasonably supports” the occurrence of a credit event is available.

However, according to the Isda spokeswoman, this language was removed from the most recent drafts, after negative feedback from end-users. “We now include language relevant to a determination that a credit event has occurred, and the publicly available information has to create a reasonable inference that a credit event has occurred,” she told RiskNews.

S&P did not respond to RiskNews’ invitation to comment on the issue. However, it is believed that the ratings agency will issue a new statement within a week regarding credit derivatives documentation language currently being considered by an Isda working group.

  • LinkedIn  
  • Save this article
  • Print this page  

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: