A New Framework for Stress Testing Banks’ Corporate Credit Portfolio

Olivier de Bandt, Vincent Martin and Eric Vansteenberghe

Since the global financial crisis triggered a major overhaul of the banking regulatory framework, unprecedented attention has been given to the stress testing of financial institutions. As a consequence, stress-test exercises have become a key risk management tool to assess the potential impact of extreme events on banks’ profit and loss (P&L) and balance-sheet structures. Stress tests are viewed as complementary to traditional risk measurement metrics such as value-at-risk (VaR) as they are an important mechanism for detecting the weaknesses of a single financial institution as well as threats to financial stability.

Globally, financial institutions are now required to perform regular exercises within Pillar II of the regulatory framework of the Basel Accord to assess the overall impact of adverse events or changes in market conditions on banks’ capital adequacy. Supervisory authorities are used to leading such exercises. For instance, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has its regular Financial Sector Assessment Program, the European Banking Authority (EBA) has the Single Supervision Mechanism in Europe with their “bottom-up” stress tests that are disclosed on an

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here