Wells Fargo’s standardised and modelled RWAs drift apart
Standardised RWAs have increased for three consecutive quarters, putting pressure on the bank’s CET1 capital ratio
Estimates of Wells Fargo’s riskiness as gauged using the regulator-set approach and the bank’s own models moved in opposite directions in the last quarter of 2021.
Total risk-weighted assets (RWAs) assessed under the standardised approach rose $19 billion quarter on quarter to $1.24 trillion, but fell almost $22 billion under the advanced approach to $1.12 trillion.
//
At end-2021, the gap between Wells Fargo’s RWAs under the two approaches was $121 billion, the widest measure since at
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
More on Risk Quantum
Investing
Private equity is finding ways to attract smaller investors
Platforms and funds of funds make it easier to get money out, but opacity and liquidity risk remain
Receive this by email