Skip to main content

Replacing VAR: smaller banks fear expected shortfall workload

Regulators sparked a lively theoretical debate at the biggest banks by proposing the use of expected shortfall as the trading book capital metric in place of the simpler incumbent measure, value-at-risk. But for small to medium-sized banks, the issue is a practical one – do they have the resources to implement it? By Laurie Carver

shortfall-web-app
Do banks have enough data to implement expected shortfall safely?

Outside a pub in London's swanky Mayfair district, the top quantitative analyst at one of the UK's biggest banks takes a gulp of his expensive lager, then shrugs in a not-my-problem kind of way. "Expected shortfall? It's not really an issue," he says. "Not for us, anyway."

Maybe so, but on the other side of the tracks, those banks with more modest resources offer a very different answer. For them

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

Show password
Hide password

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here