Beyond Basel 2.5: regulators prepare trading book review

Beyond Basel 2.5

Charles Taylor

As new trading book capital charges have piled up in the past three years – increasing from a single value-at-risk methodology to seven separate elements – so have the industry’s complaints. Banks see the regime as clunky and too conservative, arguing it double-counts risks and fails to recognise hedges. Consequently, risk managers have been looking forward to a fundamental review of trading book rules, originally scheduled for completion by the end of 2011. Having missed this self-imposed

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: