Trading book rules fail to shed light on bank capital needs

simon-hills-bba-0809

The capital charge banks can expect from new trading book rules is still unclear - despite the publication of a 43-bank study by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision on October 15.

While the quantitative impact study (QIS) reports an average increase of 223.7% in trading book capital, it does not include the impact from securitised assets. When this is added on, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association warns, capital will be boosted threefold at least, with bigger institutions

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: