Skip to main content

Incremental concerns

The Basel Committee released revised proposals on charging capital for incremental risk in the trading book in July. The new rules cover a broader range of risks beyond default, but some fear they may close off vast swathes of business. By John Ferry

asiarisk-oct08-44-gif

The Basel II framework has some gaping holes, and the credit crisis has drummed that fact home. Risk managers drastically underestimated default, correlation and liquidity risks, while it became apparent that the current value-at-risk-based measure for assessing capital for the trading book did not capture all risks associated with complex securitised products.

The political pressure for regulatory

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

Show password
Hide password

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here