Philips’ risk manager highlights VAR’s inadequacy

Speaking at FX Week’s congress last week,Kirkland said the Dutch electronics company does not use VAR methodology.

According to Kirkland, the reasons for Philips’ decision are manifold: history is not a good indicator of future events, too many estimates are required and results are more difficult to understand than simple sensitivity analysis. Philips adopted mark-to-market accounting at the start of 2000 and uses forwards and options to hedge its currency risk.

Another important limitation of VAR, highlighted by Kirkland, is the unrealistic assumption of normality. “How many times have you heard a guy on a trading floor say: ‘That was a three standard deviation move,’ only for him to say exactly the same thing again a few weeks later?” he added.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact to find out more.

The new rules of market risk management

Amid 2020’s Covid-19-related market turmoil – with volatility and value-at-risk (VAR) measures soaring – some of the world’s largest investment banks took advantage of the extraordinary conditions to notch up record trading revenues. In a recent…

ETF strategies to manage market volatility

Money managers and institutional investors are re-evaluating investment strategies in the face of rapidly shifting market conditions. Consequently, selective genres of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are seeing robust growth in assets. Hong Kong Exchanges…

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here