Out of the comfort zone


Stress testing is considered by many risk managers to be a useful supplement to other, more quantitative risk measures, such as value-at-risk. By taking a variety of core scenarios, such as the 1987 stock market crash and the Russian debt default of 1998, banks have been able to determine how their own portfolios and hedges would be affected by similar shifts in market variables.

Since the financial crisis struck in the third quarter of 2007, however, regulators have criticised the use of stress

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: