Skip to main content

Out of the comfort zone

US banking supervisors will complete stress tests early this month to determine if the country's largest banks need to hold more capital to withstand a worsening in economic conditions. But industry practitioners raise concerns about the effectiveness of stress tests based on macroeconomic conditions, and question whether the results are comparable. Mark Pengelly investigates

p20-coverstory-gif

Stress testing is considered by many risk managers to be a useful supplement to other, more quantitative risk measures, such as value-at-risk. By taking a variety of core scenarios, such as the 1987 stock market crash and the Russian debt default of 1998, banks have been able to determine how their own portfolios and hedges would be affected by similar shifts in market variables.

Since the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

Show password
Hide password

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here