A VAR, VAR better thing?


The credit crisis of late 2007 was largely a failure of risk management. As losses mounted, bank after bank admitted their risk models had been unable to predict the likelihood, speed or severity of the crisis. Attention turned in particular to the use of value-at-risk as a measure of the risk involved in a portfolio.

As reported in Risk's VAR survey (Risk January 2008, pages 68-71), several banks reported multiple VAR exceptions - in which daily trading losses exceed the limit predicted at the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: