Skip to main content

Regulatory arbitrage: back to basics

The increasing tradability of credit risk is creating complications for the Basel capital Accord that were never envisioned when the market risk amendment was first formulated. David Rowe argues that the problem is a basic inconsistency between Basel's assumptions regarding the treatment of risk in the banking and trading books

pg66-rowe-gif

Since the market risk amendment to the Basel capital Accord was introduced in the mid-1990s, there has been recurring discussion about the multiplier applied to internal value-at-risk estimates in arriving at the associated minimum regulatory capital requirement. As far as I can tell, this is best characterised as a 'regulatory comfort factor'. Apparently, a multiplier of between three

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

Show password
Hide password

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here