Sovereign two-way CSAs would probably resemble one-way posting, says Dutch DMO

netherlands-etf

Reciprocal collateral agreements between sovereign swap users and dealer counterparts would probably not be radically different to one-way credit support annex (CSA) agreements, says Erik Wilders, head of the Dutch State Treasury Agency (DSTA) in The Hague.

"In theory, if we were to sign two-way CSAs with swap dealers, the agreements would have to provide enough warranties to ensure we never get exposure to the credit risk of a bank. In other words, the CSAs would have very high posting

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: