Skip to main content

Jane Street claims may prompt bank scrutiny

Reputational risk policies require dealers to quiz clients that hit the headlines

A magnifying glass rests on top of hundreds of paper pages, representing scrutiny

Jane Street could face awkward questions from its clearing brokers and bank counterparties, after the prop trader was accused of market manipulation in India – although little may ultimately come of that scrutiny.

According to clearing and trading executives at four different institutions, bank policies usually require reviews of clients accused of wrongdoing – a guard against reputational risk –

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

Show password
Hide password

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here