The great migration: CCPs ponder life after Span

As CME moves to a value-at-risk methodology, CCPs that license its model look on nervously

When Risk.net first reported CME Group’s plans to stop using its long-established Span margin framework, one senior risk manager’s reaction probably summed up how many of his peers felt at the 50-odd firms that license it: “What – CME’s moving away from Span? The Span we use? The Span everyone uses?”

CME’s decision to begin moving its vast futures and options product universe to a new margin model – dubbed ‘Span 2’ (see box: Span 2: harder, better, faster, stronger), but in essence a classic

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: