The disputed terrain of model risk scoring

There is no concord on how banks should police their model risk. But two Fed economists have an idea

As banks lean ever more heavily on models – for pricing, risk, capital and other vitals – their boards are demanding a clear view of exactly how much risk those models entail, and how they may be abetting or denting the bank’s financial position. But there is no clear path on how to deliver that.

“We all have different techniques,” says the head of model risk management at a US G-Sib. “Everybody is not using the same approach, but everyone has an approach.”

Into this wilderness have stepped

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: