Not so DFAST: slim Mizuho avoids stress

Mizuho Americas has remained lean to head off CCAR, and, post-Crapo, it’s clear of DFAST, too

Eric Yoss
Eric Yoss, Mizuho Americas: “It wasn’t a certainty that [the Crapo bill] would provide relief”
Marian Goldman

A combination of deft manoeuvring and luck has allowed Mizuho Americas to slip the grasp of the Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test (DFAST) and its much tougher cousin, the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR).

And the bank couldn’t have done it without Mike Crapo.

Prior to the US’s Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act, or Crapo bill, banks with over $50 billion in assets were subject to CCAR. And any bank with $10 billion assets or more would have been subject to

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

If you already have an account, please sign in here.

Register

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: