CCP margin backtests can hide flaws, research finds

In richer test, ‘filtered’ VAR beats five other measures

margin levels
Backtests should focus not merely on number of margin breaches, researchers argue

Backtesting of the models used to determine clearing house margin requirements needs to change its focus if margin is to do its job, two risk researchers at Singapore Exchange have argued. They claim current tests focus too heavily on breaches – the number of times losses exceed margin.

The research offers a new approach to backtesting, which assesses three other aspects of a model’s performance and finds a variant of value-at-risk outperforms five rival margin models. The researchers –

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

If you already have an account, please sign in here.

Register

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here