Credit derivatives disclosure still lacking, says Basel Committee
The disclosure by banks related to their credit mitigation techniques is still lacking, according to a survey released today by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The survey analysed public disclosure by banks in 2001 and found that, although the overall level of public disclosure by banks on items disclosure hit 63% compared with 59% in 2000, there was still scope for significant improvement.
Overall qualitative reporting of derivatives information, excluding credit derivatives, remained fairly high, with 80% of banks discussing their objectives for the use of non-trading derivatives and how these are used to hedge risks. But quantitative information on derivatives use was less widely available. Apart from the gross positive (81%) and negative (70%) market values of derivatives that were disclosed, only 35% of banks disclosed the future potential exposures for derivatives, and 39% disclosed the notional amounts and average marked values for trading and non-trading portfolios. Qualitative information on the use of credit derivatives was disclosed by 51% of respondents, with 54% disclosing their notional amounts of these products. Only 30% of respondents listed a breakdown of the different types of credit derivatives products in their portfolios.
The most noteworthy improvement from the previous year was in the disclosure of information on ‘other risks’, such as operational, liquidity and interest rate risk, up from 65% in 2000 to 84%. The report also points to the enhanced transparency in the area of securitisation, which has grown alongside the general growth in the industry. But this still remains fairly limited compared with other activities, with only 45% of all banks reporting their securitisation activities, both quantitatively and qualitatively.
The report said banks should further enhance their transparency, particularly pointing to disclosure on the use of credit risk mitigation techniques, including credit derivatives. This is especially important, as disclosure in these areas will be qualifying criteria for the recognition or use of these techniques for capital relief under the new capital Accord, Basel II.
The survey, focusing on the annual reports of 54 banks, posed 104 questions addressing quantitative and qualitative disclosures on issues such as capital structure, capital adequacy, market risk modelling, credit risk modelling, securitisation and derivatives.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
One-factor rates models sit behind most XVA calculations
Risk Benchmarking: Dealers coalesce around calibration depth, but runtimes and lookbacks vary sharply
Could a prediction market bet get you fired by your bank?
At least half of US systemic banks limit personal prediction trades, but mention markets still a concern
Dealers still split on XVA desks’ funding remit
Risk Benchmarking: Global dealers use XVA desks to manage swaps funding needs, but most treasuries retain some control
How enterprise risk rose to the top of the bank
Previously a support function, ERM is naturally positioned to identify strategic risks for the board
Can prediction markets pass the institutional sniff test?
Regulated firms need credible event determination methodologies and cross-product margining to enable use, say experts
Most dealers run central XVA desks, but remits vary
Risk Benchmarking: Many banks struggle to track XVA costs and share of derivatives compute
EU banks in India cut contingency costs after clearing deal
Esma MoU with two Indian regulators lifts threat to direct clearing for BNP, SocGen and Deutsche
Big banks look to XVA desks to crush counterparty exposures
Risk Benchmarking: Two-thirds of global dealers run routine optimisation, compared with just 13% of smaller players