Time-series pioneers share Nobel Prize for Economics
Robert Engle, a finance professor at New York University, and Clive Granger, currently a visiting scholar at New Zealand’s Canterbury University, will share this year’s Nobel Prize for Economics. The recipients’ work on the analysis of time-series data has provided powerful mathematical tools for research in derivatives pricing, risk management and economics.
The Nobel Committee said Engle’s award recognises his role in devising “methods for analysing economic time series with varying volatility”, while Granger created “methods of analysing economic time series with common trends”.
Up until the mid-to-late-1980s, many risk managers, traders and academics largely assumed volatility was constant over time. The jettisoning of this flawed assumption in the interim is in no small way due to Engle’s work in the early 1980s, when he developed the concept of autoregressive heteroskedasticity (Arch). This statistical technique ushered in a new era of more realistic volatility modelling.
Engle will speak about a new correlation estimator for credit risk evaluation at Risk’s Credit Risk Summit Europe 2003, which will be held in London on October 21 and October 22. He has a long relationship with Risk, with some of his earlier volatility research appearing in the magazine - see ‘Garch for Groups’, Risk August 1996, page 36; and ‘Grappling with Garch’, Risk September 1995, page 112. Both technical papers were co-authored with Joseph Mezrich.
Granger’s research has been particularly useful in macroeconomic analysis. Most significantly, he discovered certain combinations of non-stationary time series exhibit stationarity - that is, the series fluctuates around a specific value. This result allows robust statistical inferences to be made, which shed new light on the relations between consumption and wealth, and short- and long-term interest rates, for example.
Engle and Granger will receive a total award of SKr10 million ($1.3 million).
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Op risk data: EFG takes a bath for two decades of money laundering
Also: Deepfake voice clone cons Intesa division; key couple of cryptocurrency hacks. Data by ORX News
Managing risk to accelerate agentic AI value creation
Banks can accelerate agentic AI adoption by aligning each use case’s risks, controls and capabilities, enabling safe, accountable and value-driven deployment
One legal entity. Multiple IDs. Three business risks.
How fragmented entity IDs undermine risk, compliance and revenue decisions
An agentic bank? Not so fast
With no clear definition or way to gauge ROI, claims of AI adoption should be taken with a pinch of salt
BIS’s Hernández de Cos on AI, non-bank risk and tokenisation
General manager talks about how the BIS is navigating a complex global environment
For enterprise risk, influence runs deeper than any veto
Risk Benchmarking study finds formal veto rights concentrated among the largest lenders, but used only as a last resort
Intraday pricing: fixed income’s next frontier
With firms looking to price fixed income securities on an intraday basis, specialist pricing providers such as LSEG help address cost, complexity and time-to-market challenges
Tech and data fragmentation irks enterprise risk managers
Risk Benchmarking: Often at the mercy of decisions made by other parts of the bank, ERM heads gripe at disparate systems, poor UX and reporting gaps