Time-series pioneers share Nobel Prize for Economics
Robert Engle, a finance professor at New York University, and Clive Granger, currently a visiting scholar at New Zealand’s Canterbury University, will share this year’s Nobel Prize for Economics. The recipients’ work on the analysis of time-series data has provided powerful mathematical tools for research in derivatives pricing, risk management and economics.
The Nobel Committee said Engle’s award recognises his role in devising “methods for analysing economic time series with varying volatility”, while Granger created “methods of analysing economic time series with common trends”.
Up until the mid-to-late-1980s, many risk managers, traders and academics largely assumed volatility was constant over time. The jettisoning of this flawed assumption in the interim is in no small way due to Engle’s work in the early 1980s, when he developed the concept of autoregressive heteroskedasticity (Arch). This statistical technique ushered in a new era of more realistic volatility modelling.
Engle will speak about a new correlation estimator for credit risk evaluation at Risk’s Credit Risk Summit Europe 2003, which will be held in London on October 21 and October 22. He has a long relationship with Risk, with some of his earlier volatility research appearing in the magazine - see ‘Garch for Groups’, Risk August 1996, page 36; and ‘Grappling with Garch’, Risk September 1995, page 112. Both technical papers were co-authored with Joseph Mezrich.
Granger’s research has been particularly useful in macroeconomic analysis. Most significantly, he discovered certain combinations of non-stationary time series exhibit stationarity - that is, the series fluctuates around a specific value. This result allows robust statistical inferences to be made, which shed new light on the relations between consumption and wealth, and short- and long-term interest rates, for example.
Engle and Granger will receive a total award of SKr10 million ($1.3 million).
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
FSB warns of ‘circles of risks’ in bank risk transfer deals
Credit lines, portfolio financing and NAV facilities for private credit funds could rebound on banks
Barclays built a risk framework for GenAI from scratch
Eleven teams contribute to assessing generative AI use cases in a system that includes 35 controls
Hopes, fears and ‘mass confusion’: the sudden end of SR 11-7
Banks welcome chance to prioritise model reviews, but fret over future policy changes and AI
Bootcamps and peer pressure: Goldman preps staff for AI future
Isda AGM: Tone from the top is not enough, says chief information officer Marco Argenti
In Iran war, VAR models ease cliff effect on Ice and CME margins
At 105%, EEX – using Span model – saw largest single-day jump compared with those CCPs
MRM: how banks are scaling models in the age of AI
MRM capabilities are evolving to ensure compliance while helping organisations retain a competitive edge
ALM in 2026: the fast-track from compliance to competitive edge
How banks are modernising asset-liability management for a more volatile world
Why AI-related conduct risk is reshaping the business agenda
Trust in AI-only approaches remains limited, and explainability is becoming critical to modern risk management