Home-host hearing raises key issues
LONDON – Although the tone of the October 5 public hearing at the secretariat of the Commission of European Banking Supervisors (CEBS) on guidelines for greater supervisory co-operation between consolidating supervisors and host supervisors (CP-09) was generally positive, industry executives focused their questions on the practical realities of implementation. Attendees stressed that the devil is in the detail, and questions focused on areas such as managing communication between and within regulators and banking groups, where the decision to apply for Advanced Measurement lie, and just how transparent the communication process will be from a bank's perspective.
For its part, the CEBS watchwords were transparency, dialogue and the flexibility to treat situations on a case-by-case basis. The CEBS, which held the meeting hot on the heels of passage of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD), pointed out that European supervisors have been expanding and improving communication, and said that for the most part the systemisation of communication is proving successful. It also used the meeting to reinforce its message that it welcomed and expected further
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
Benchmark switch leaves hedging headache for Philippine banks
If interest rates are cut before new benchmark docs are ready, banks face possible NII squeeze
Op risk data: Tech glitch gives customers unlimited funds
Also: Payback for slow Paycheck Protection payouts; SEC hits out at AI washing. Data by ORX News
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure
Industry warns CFTC against rushing to regulate AI for trading
Vote on workplan pulled amid calls to avoid duplicating rules from other regulatory agencies
Top 10 op risks: Change brings challenges as banks splash the cash
Higher interest margins and a trend toward insourcing drive major tech projects
Top 10 op risks: deepfakes drive rise in fraud fears
External fraud re-enters top 10 as artificial intelligence provides new tools for criminals
Should the ECB stress-test counterparty default risks?
The US Fed already does, but it is notable that EU banks were less exposed to Archegos
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
- LCH issued highest cash call in more than five years