Institute of Op Risk up and running
LONDON – The Institute of Operational Risk, long in the planning stages, is now gathering momentum, according to Philip Martin, director of the organisation.
The Institute was founded in February 2005 as an offshoot of the Operational Risk Research Forum. ORRF, which is now a for-profit organisation, was founded by Brendon Young, who is an independent consultant but was formerly focused on operational risk at rating agency Moody's. The original intention of the Institute, which has official UK 'institute' status, was to provide education and accreditation services to the operational risk industry, which would include the creation of a qualification. However, the Institute has been beset by organisational difficulties, according to former members.
Martin says these problems have been resolved and a new council of directors as well as a steering committee were appointed at the annual general meeting held in December. Martin says: "We want to promote op risk as a recognised discipline in financial services."
Martin says the Institute is now in the throes of a membership drive to recruit executives from a wide range of related disciplines, including business continuity, security, anti-money laundering and other related fields. To achieve membership, applicants must be interviewed by two existing Institute fellows, as well as provide details about their professional background, references, and other information.
Also, a subcommittee has been established to examine the operational risk-related courses offered by various educational institutions and develop a framework to 'credit' those courses towards a standard level of knowledge and accomplishment for membership to the Institute.
The new council of directors for the organisation includes: Peter Brown, Brown Westbury Consulting; George Clark, National Australia Group Europe; Michael Faber, JP Morgan Cazenove; Philip Martin, Enterprise Risk Advisory & Consultancy; Michael Tripp, Ernst & Young; and Brendon Young, Operational Risk Research Forum.
The new steering committee includes: George Clark, National Australia Group Europe; John Charters, National Australia Bank, Australia; Victor Dowd, Enterprise Risk Advisory & Consultancy; Michael Faber, JP Morgan Cazenove; David Lau, Deloitte, Hong Kong; Philip Martin, Enterprise Risk Advisory & Consultancy; Ed Sankey, Larocourt; and Michael Tripp, Ernst & Young.
Martin says a new chapter has also been launched in Australia. OR&C
Oprisk & complianceOnly users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
AI spend in US could be good for bonds in Europe – finance chiefs
Development of AI is capital-intensive, but adoption less so, which could favour EU
Climate risk managers’ top challenge: a dearth of data
Risk Benchmarking: Banks see client engagement and lender data pooling as solutions to climate blind spots – but few expect it to happen soon
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
At BNY, a risk-centric approach to GenAI
Centralised platform allows bank to focus on risk management, governance and, not least, talent in its AI build
Many banks yet to factor climate into credit risk models
Risk Benchmarking: More than a third of banks do not quantify climate risk impact on credit portfolios, study finds
We’re gonna need a bigger board: geopolitical risk takes centre stage
As threats multiply, responsibility for geopolitical risk is shifting to ERM teams
CROs shoulder climate risk load, but bigger org picture is murky
Risk Benchmarking: Dedicated teams vary wildly in size, while ownership is shared among risk, sustainability and the business