Institute of Op Risk up and running
LONDON – The Institute of Operational Risk, long in the planning stages, is now gathering momentum, according to Philip Martin, director of the organisation.
The Institute was founded in February 2005 as an offshoot of the Operational Risk Research Forum. ORRF, which is now a for-profit organisation, was founded by Brendon Young, who is an independent consultant but was formerly focused on operational risk at rating agency Moody's. The original intention of the Institute, which has official UK 'institute' status, was to provide education and accreditation services to the operational risk industry, which would include the creation of a qualification. However, the Institute has been beset by organisational difficulties, according to former members.
Martin says these problems have been resolved and a new council of directors as well as a steering committee were appointed at the annual general meeting held in December. Martin says: "We want to promote op risk as a recognised discipline in financial services."
Martin says the Institute is now in the throes of a membership drive to recruit executives from a wide range of related disciplines, including business continuity, security, anti-money laundering and other related fields. To achieve membership, applicants must be interviewed by two existing Institute fellows, as well as provide details about their professional background, references, and other information.
Also, a subcommittee has been established to examine the operational risk-related courses offered by various educational institutions and develop a framework to 'credit' those courses towards a standard level of knowledge and accomplishment for membership to the Institute.
The new council of directors for the organisation includes: Peter Brown, Brown Westbury Consulting; George Clark, National Australia Group Europe; Michael Faber, JP Morgan Cazenove; Philip Martin, Enterprise Risk Advisory & Consultancy; Michael Tripp, Ernst & Young; and Brendon Young, Operational Risk Research Forum.
The new steering committee includes: George Clark, National Australia Group Europe; John Charters, National Australia Bank, Australia; Victor Dowd, Enterprise Risk Advisory & Consultancy; Michael Faber, JP Morgan Cazenove; David Lau, Deloitte, Hong Kong; Philip Martin, Enterprise Risk Advisory & Consultancy; Ed Sankey, Larocourt; and Michael Tripp, Ernst & Young.
Martin says a new chapter has also been launched in Australia. OR&C
Oprisk & complianceOnly users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
How AI agents can join the dots for risk managers
Citi risk expert outlines agentic AI tool that would pull together structured and unstructured data on trading and lending approvals to create single, unified view of risk
The interplay between liquidity and collateral
The evolution of financing solutions as institutional investors raise and preserve cash
Do banks still need to validate GenAI models?
Regulators carved out GenAI models from new risk guidance. Banks shouldn’t see this as a reason to stop validating them.
FSB warns of ‘circles of risks’ in bank risk transfer deals
Credit lines, portfolio financing and NAV facilities for private credit funds could rebound on banks
Barclays built a risk framework for GenAI from scratch
Eleven teams contribute to assessing generative AI use cases in a system that includes 35 controls
Hopes, fears and ‘mass confusion’: the sudden end of SR 11-7
Banks welcome chance to prioritise model reviews, but fret over future policy changes and AI
Bootcamps and peer pressure: Goldman preps staff for AI future
Isda AGM: Tone from the top is not enough, says chief information officer Marco Argenti
In Iran war, VAR models ease cliff effect on Ice and CME margins
At 105%, EEX – using Span model – saw largest single-day jump compared with those CCPs