More US companies to expense stock options
Two more US companies are set to follow Coca-Cola’s example of expensing their stock option plans. The Atlanta-based drinks company last week said it plans to expense the cost of all stock options the company grants beginning in the fourth quarter.
At present, companies do not have to expense share options, but this is likely to change due to current market concerns about the accuracy of corporate results - especially in the US.
“These changes reflect our ongoing commitment to ensuring that all compensation costs are clearly recorded in our financial statements,” said James Rogers, Cinergy’s chief executive officer.
Jeffrey Lane, chief executive officer of Neuberger Berman, commented: “As an asset manager, we depend on the transparency of financial statements in making investment decisions for our clients. The same transparency should extend to our own accounting methods.”
The US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the official US body for establishing standards of financial accounting, encourages fair value as opposed to ‘intrinsic value’ reporting. The intrinsic method measures the difference between the market price of the underlying stock and the exercise price of the option. It is also measured from the grant date of the option, but generally gives a compensation cost of zero because most companies set the exercise price of the option equal to the market price of the share at the grant date.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
SGX fortifies its defences to ward off tomorrow’s outages
Exchange operator fosters “breach mentality” to help prepare for business disruption, explains risk chief
Op risk data: FIS pays the price for Worldpay synergy slip-up
Also: Liberty Mutual rings up record age bias case; Nationwide’s fraud failings. Data by ORX News
Banks hold 73% of liquidity buffer in cash and Level 1 assets, on average
Largest lenders hold highest share of central bank reserves in buffer, latest analysis shows
EBA supports global op risk taxonomy, but it won’t happen soon
New EU framework designed to ease adoption by banks; other jurisdictions have different priorities
Macro shocks force risk reset in Asia
Measuring, managing and responding to geopolitical uncertainty and volatility
Allocating financing costs: centralised vs decentralised treasury
Centralisation can boost efficiency when coupled with an effective pricing and attribution framework
EVE and NII dominate IRRBB limit-setting
ALM Benchmarking study finds majority of banks relying on hard risk limits, and a minority supplementing with early-warning indicators
Banks split over AI risk management
Model teams hold the reins, but some argue AI is an enterprise risk