More US companies to expense stock options
Two more US companies are set to follow Coca-Cola’s example of expensing their stock option plans. The Atlanta-based drinks company last week said it plans to expense the cost of all stock options the company grants beginning in the fourth quarter.
At present, companies do not have to expense share options, but this is likely to change due to current market concerns about the accuracy of corporate results - especially in the US.
“These changes reflect our ongoing commitment to ensuring that all compensation costs are clearly recorded in our financial statements,” said James Rogers, Cinergy’s chief executive officer.
Jeffrey Lane, chief executive officer of Neuberger Berman, commented: “As an asset manager, we depend on the transparency of financial statements in making investment decisions for our clients. The same transparency should extend to our own accounting methods.”
The US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the official US body for establishing standards of financial accounting, encourages fair value as opposed to ‘intrinsic value’ reporting. The intrinsic method measures the difference between the market price of the underlying stock and the exercise price of the option. It is also measured from the grant date of the option, but generally gives a compensation cost of zero because most companies set the exercise price of the option equal to the market price of the share at the grant date.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Trading desks urged to bolster cross-market surveillance
Artificial intelligence could help track market abuse across different instruments and venues
Clearing banks pick holes in VAR-based CCP margin models
New models ease cliff effects, but banks say they are less predictable and prone to undershooting
Hard day’s night: Kalshi’s round-the-clock enforcement head
Robert DeNault wants market-leading tech to handle up to 40 insider trading cases at a time
We won’t copy UST clearing mandate wholesale in UK – BoE
Senior official also indicates that any minimum repo haircuts will likely be calculated at portfolio level
Why Apac CROs are turning risk into strategic advantage
Resilience, agility and AI-driven analysis are becoming as important as traditional risk oversight for Apac CROs
Half of banks use scenarios to set third-party Pillar 2 capital
Risk Benchmarking study finds resilience risk less widely covered than cyber and IT disruption, but more formalised where scenarios exist
Don’t mind the gap risk: regulatory treatment of credit repacks
Gap risk in repackaging is not a credit valuation adjustment for Basel III capital purposes, argues senior quant Andrey Chirikhin
Everything is connected: Santander’s US CRO shuns siloed thinking
Rise of AI intensifies links between fraud, cyber, third-party and other operational risk categories