UBS and Credit Suisse poised for tighter regulation
Swiss regulator out with proposals for tighter regulation of global banks
From January 1, 2013, the two banks will have to hold increased capital buffers above the Basel II minimum requirements - they will need to meet a minimum ratio (capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets) of 12%, which could rise to 16% in good times - defined as a period of two years of profits at the average level.
UBS and Credit Suisse will also have to hold capital as a percentage of (unweighted) assets of at least 3% at group level and 4% at bank level - higher in good times. This leverage ratio excludes domestic lending (except interbank) and selected assets used in central bank repos.
Finma has also published proposals for rules on bankers' pay, which are now out for comment. Under the proposal, all Swiss banks would have to ensure high risk incurred by employees results in lower variable remuneration than low risk. Bonuses should also only be paid when the group is profitable and all award criteria should be long-term oriented.
The regulators have also issued new guidelines for liquidity requirements and stress testing. In common with the EU and the US, the SNB is pushing for an international framework to allow a co-ordinated unwinding of a failed bank to address the 'too big to fail' problem of systemically relevant institutions. Another option being looked at is limiting the size of banks either by defining direct limits or by setting indirect incentives such as higher capital requirements to keep the size down.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Microsoft outage disrupts structured notes trading
Document-heavy OTC trades upended as term sheets and confirmations languished in outboxes
One-factor rates models sit behind most XVA calculations
Risk Benchmarking: Dealers coalesce around calibration depth, but runtimes and lookbacks vary sharply
Could a prediction market bet get you fired by your bank?
At least half of US systemic banks limit personal prediction trades, but mention markets still a concern
Dealers still split on XVA desks’ funding remit
Risk Benchmarking: Global dealers use XVA desks to manage swaps funding needs, but most treasuries retain some control
How enterprise risk rose to the top of the bank
Previously a support function, ERM is naturally positioned to identify strategic risks for the board
Can prediction markets pass the institutional sniff test?
Regulated firms need credible event determination methodologies and cross-product margining to enable use, say experts
Most dealers run central XVA desks, but remits vary
Risk Benchmarking: Many banks struggle to track XVA costs and share of derivatives compute
EU banks in India cut contingency costs after clearing deal
Esma MoU with two Indian regulators lifts threat to direct clearing for BNP, SocGen and Deutsche