Ceiops announces preliminary QIS4 results
Ceiops has presented the initial results of its fourth quantitative impact study
FRANKFURT – As the European Union timetable for Solvency II rumbles on, the Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (Ceiops) has announced to stakeholders the preliminary findings of its fourth quantitative impact study (QIS4). Last month, the UK Financial Services Authority strongly urged insurance firms to participate in QIS4 – Ceiops’ latest look at the capital requirements and risk management implications of Solvency II.
Ceiops has found the need for further refinement of some specific Level 2 issues, but the insurance industry broadly supports the implementation of Solvency II’s risk-based supervisory framework.
Balance sheets will remain fundamentally unchanged but be characterised by a reduction in the amount of insurance liabilities compared to an increase in eligible capital.
Ceiops also says QIS4 testing shows most participants will meet the planned directive’s minimum capital and solvency requirements. The final report will be reported at the annual Ceiops conference on November 19.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Clear warning on escape hatch for optimisation trades
CCPs fear Emir clearing mandate carve-out for portfolio rebalancing could be abused
One year on, regulators still want a cure for bank runs
Broad support for higher outflow assumptions on uninsured deposits, but that won’t save insolvent banks
Falling T2 balances bode well for eurozone’s stability
Impact of fragmentation would be less severe today than in 2010s, says Marcello Minenna
For a growing number of banks, synthetics are the real deal
More lenders want to use SRTs to offload credit risk, but old hands say they have a long road ahead
Did Fed’s stress capital buffer blunt CCAR?
Experts fear flagship test’s use as a capital top-up has undermined its role in risk management
How Ally found the key to GenAI at the bottom of a teacup
Risk-and-tech chemistry – plus Microsoft’s flexibility – has seen US lender leap from experiments to execution
Industry urges focus on initial margin instead of intraday VM
CPMI-Iosco says scheduled variation margin is better than ad hoc calls by clearing houses
Consortium backs BGC’s effort to challenge CME
Banks and market-makers – including BofA, Citi, Goldman, Jump and Tower – will have a 26% stake in FMX
Most read
- Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
- Breaking out of the cells: banks’ long goodbye to spreadsheets
- Too soon to say good riddance to banks’ public enemy number one