
Here come the directives
The mudslide of EU financial services directives is, well, daunting. It's not that firms are against the EU -- most financial services executives are pretty excited about cross-border marketing. The problem is that financial regulation on the continent is different. For starters, it is rules based. I remember one association official telling me, two years ago, how UK practices would revolutionise continental supervision. Now, it seems, things have flipped to be the other way around.
Indeed, in our cover story, a UK Financial Services Authority official admitted that the regulator is becoming increasingly marginalised in terms of policy-making. The FSA must implement a 'copy out' of directives, and one of the foundation cornerstones of UK's unique regulatory regime -- guidance -- is gone.
Contrast this with the US -- the country that initially spurned op risk is now embracing it. On my recent trip to New York, bank executives said they now understand the 'business case' for op risk. US regulators are conducting benchmarking studies and QIS4. A conference is planned. Suddenly, Europe no longer has the lead on op risk.
If the burden of EU directives becomes overwhelming, Europe's daring vision of the op risk discipline could be appropriated by US regulators and firms. OpRisk
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
‘More questions than answers’ in race to build repo plumbing
Complexity could slow development of matching and credit-checking tools for US Treasury trades
How Citi moved GenAI from firm-wide ban to internal roll-out
Bank adopted three specific inward-facing use cases with a unified framework behind them
Margin standards are here – and clearing firms aren’t happy
Clearing members complain that latest transparency proposals would force them to act as middlemen by providing margin simulation tools for clients
Riding the storm: banking in the era of climate risk
Climate-related risk is playing an increasing role in banks’ future strategies, resilience and prosperity
Buffer stop: Eurex clearing members shunt default fund
Clearing house’s CRO says both members and clients opt to pay more margin instead
How a serverless risk engine transformed a digital bank
Migrating to the cloud permitted scalability, faster model updates and a better team structure
During Trump turbulence, value-at-risk may go pop
Trading risk models have been trained in quiet markets, and volatility is now looming
Osttra to launch Treasury clearing middleware
Mid-year delivery expected for system that aids credit checking for repo trades