Doubts plague Emir reporting clean-up

Industry still advocates single-sided reporting as a way to improve EU swaps data quality

The European Market Infrastructure Regulation (Emir) is not the kind of issue to put protesters on the streets, but one aspect has provoked a particularly sustained campaign of complaints and lobbying from the financial sector. This is the requirement, unique among major financial jurisdictions, for both counterparties to a trade to provide regulatory reporting.

European policymakers contend that dual-sided reporting provides an extra opportunity to cross-check the derivatives data submitted to

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here