FRTB capital quirk for sovereign bonds bewilders banks

EU treatment of govvies under internal models is worse than standardised approaches

capital imbalance

This is the second of two articles on the implementation of FRTB in the European Union. For the first article, on non-modellable risk factors, please see here.

There was a time when the pinnacle of bank capital management was having internal models that could accurately estimate the risks arising from portfolios. Those models are supposed to be more sophisticated, and therefore offer banks the chance to optimise capital requirements compared with regulator-set standardised approaches.

But a

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to View our subscription options


Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here