Firms doubt benefits of EU Mifid best execution reform

Esma proposal retains unpopular aggregated reporting; bankers want more cost-benefit analysis

Esma new building_credit Esma.jpg
Esma: doubts remain over doubts its reports will provide investors with relevant information
Esma

Proposed reforms to European rules requiring investment firms to demonstrate to clients they are getting the best possible execution on trades may not be worth the effort, bankers warn.

“I’m not convinced you will ever be able to produce something that works for everybody,” said Rachel Cockshutt, head of regulatory change in Europe at the Royal Bank of Canada. “And ultimately, yes, there has been a cost burden to firms of producing these things to date, but there’s also a cost burden of

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: