FSB debates how to fit climate risk into capital rules

Regulators ponder whether climate risk needs new RWAs or recalibration of existing ones


Regulators are still undecided on whether the risks associated with climate change can be handled within the existing bank prudential framework, or will need separate risk weights and capital add-ons, an official at the Financial Stability Board has said.

Joseph Noss, head of vulnerabilities assessment at the FSB, told an event organised by the Institute for International Finance (IIF) on September 16 that climate risks are broad and non-linear, and that past data was a “poor guide” to the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: