EBA faces backlash over ‘green asset ratio’

Bankers reject proposed climate risk measure as flawed and even ‘dangerous’

Europlaza tower Paris
The EBA’s new headquarters at Europlaza Tower, Paris
© Daniel Rodet

Making European lenders disclose the amount of ‘green assets’ they hold will reveal little about the climate risks they are exposed to, and could muddle the existing regulatory framework for measuring risk and capital adequacy, banks say.   

A proposal released by the European Banking Authority (EBA) on March 1 would require large financial institutions to publish a ‘green asset ratio’ (GAR) as part of their Pillar 3 disclosures. The GAR would show the percentage of loans, debt and equity

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: