US version of SA-CCR could hurt settled-to-market swaps

Capital requirements on a client’s hedged options portfolio could increase by 1,100%

Snakes and ladders
Win/lose situation: regulators who gave STM thumbs up are now removing netting benefits

Swaps contracts with inbuilt daily settlement as an alternative to paying variation margin have been touted as a way to lower risk in the system – and lower bank capital requirements at the same time.

But less than two years after US supervisors appeared to accept these arguments, market participants say proposed new rules on counterparty credit risk cast fresh doubt on the accounting and regulatory treatment for settled-to-market (STM) swaps, and contradict the existing legal framework for

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: