US version of SA-CCR could hurt settled-to-market swaps
Capital requirements on a client’s hedged options portfolio could increase by 1,100%
Swaps contracts with inbuilt daily settlement as an alternative to paying variation margin have been touted as a way to lower risk in the system – and lower bank capital requirements at the same time.
But less than two years after US supervisors appeared to accept these arguments, market participants say proposed new rules on counterparty credit risk cast fresh doubt on the accounting and regulatory treatment for settled-to-market (STM) swaps, and contradict the existing legal framework for
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
More on Regulation
7 days in 60 seconds
Oil price models, IM changes and VAR caps
The week on Risk.net, May 16-22, 2020
Receive this by email