Amber zone in new P&L test ‘almost useless’, say banks

Analysis shows many desks would not benefit from safe harbour in Basel FRTB proposals

amber light_Getty - web.jpg
Amber zone: “The gap between going into green and red doesn’t make much difference,” says a market risk manager

Parameters set by international regulators for trading desks to qualify for an intermediate capital charge under suggested amendments to market risk capital rules are too restrictive to avoid cliff effects in capital, according to bankers who have simulated the impact of the proposals.

Regulators aim to give banks more breathing space in a key modelling test by introducing an “amber zone”, alongside a simple pass or fail.

“The calibration they have made for the parameters is too narrow,” says

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to View our subscription options


Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here