Barristers' boycott could threaten Libor cases

Cuts to legal aid fees will hamper complex fraud trials


Yesterday's decision by a judge to abandon a fraud trial in London due to legal aid cuts could endanger trials of those accused of rigging the Libor interbank rate.

The Public Defender Service for England and Wales had been unable to recruit barristers to represent the defendants in R. v Crawley and others, due to government-imposed 30% cuts on the fees paid to lawyers in the longest and most demanding cases – those expected to last more than 60 days or cost one side more than £150,000

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to View our subscription options

If you already have an account, please sign in here.


Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here