Fed outlines Volcker rule timeline
Banks will get up to five years' grace to divest fund investments
US regulators are still months away from final rulemaking on the implementation of the Volcker rule - the restrictions on prop trading and fund investments by banks devised by former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker and included in Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. But the Fed today issued final rules on the time banks will be given to comply with the new rule.
The rule itself will come into force on July 21 next year - or 12 months after final rules are issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Fed - whichever is later. But banks will be given a grace period after this point to fall into line.
In general, banks will have two years to divest any investments in funds or products that violate the rule. But the Fed will be able to grant up to three one-year extensions to individual banks at its discretion, as long as the bank applies 180 days in advance. Banks with existing investments or contractual ties to 'illiquid' funds - funds that mainly invest in illiquid assets that are not exchange-traded or electronically quoted, and which have initial tenors over a year - will be granted five years to extricate themselves.
Unanswered questions remain around the extent of the limits on prop trading - the dividing line between permitted hedging or market-making activities and prohibited proprietary investment is still unclear. Today's rule release offers little insight into these questions, though it does guarantee that banks worried about their future trading and hedging plans will have at least three and possibly as many as six years from the final rule release this summer in which to adapt.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EC’s closing auction plan faces cool reception from markets
Participants say proposal for multiple EU equity closing auctions would split price formation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint
Hopes rise for EU re-entry to UK swaps market
EC says discussions on draft decision softening derivatives trading obligation are ‘advanced’
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond