Tackling pro-cyclicality in banking regulation

Paul Harrald and Tom Sandall
22 Oct 2010

Tweet
Facebook
LinkedIn
Save this article
Send to
Print this page

Banking regulation exists largely to maintain systemic stability. This is a goal in which it has spectacularly failed in recent years, in particular in the developed economies with the supposedly most sophisticated regulators and supervisory practices.

The debate currently taking place between politicians, supervisors and the financial industry on how to reshape regulation, has come to a general consensus on the need for a number of changes. In particular, widespread agreement now appears to

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/

If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]

You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/

If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]