
SEC tightens rules further on short selling
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has released new rules on short selling, aimed at preventing sustained declines in stock prices. Rule 201, published yesterday, includes a 'circuit breaker' that would trip if the price of a security fell more than 10% during a day of trading. After the circuit breaker had been tripped, short selling would be banned unless the price was above the current best bid. The objective of this rule, known as the alternative uptick rule, is to stop short sellers driving the price down further.
The rule represents an amalgamation of two suggestions made by the SEC in August last year – it originally proposed to permit only short sales above the last sale price or national best bid, or to impose a circuit breaker that would stop short selling altogether after a fall below a certain threshold. A previous uptick rule was abolished in 2007 – this permitted short selling only when the last sale was made at a higher price than the sale before.
Bans or restrictions on short selling, especially of financial stocks, were put in place around the world during the financial crisis, but their effect is debatable, with some research suggesting they might have increased volatility. The SEC's ban came into force on September 19, 2008, as markets tumbled after the collapse of Lehman Brothers. The regulator had imposed a ban on naked short selling of financial stock in July the same year.
SEC chairman Mary Schapiro said the rule represented the regulator's concern that "excessive downward price pressure on individual securities, accompanied by the fear of unconstrained short selling, can destabilise our markets and undermine investor confidence in our markets".
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
More on Regulation
Regulation
French regulator questions need for share trading equivalence
Esma’s reinterpretation ahead of Brexit reduces need for equivalence system, says AMF official
Receive this by email