SEC charges stockbroker over $250 million Ponzi
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) this week charged a Detroit-based stockbroker over a Ponzi scheme that allegedly tricked elderly investors out of $250 million. The SEC says Frank Bluestein persuaded elderly homeowners to refinance their home mortgages, acting as the principal salesman for the scheme operated by Edward May and his E-M Management Company (E-M).
The US regulator’s complaint alleges Bluestein raised around $74 million from more than 800 investors through the sale of E-M securities over a five-year period. The SEC brought separate charges against May in November 2007 over allegations he used a phoney Las Vegas casino and resort telecommunications deal to dupe up to 1,200 elderly citizens.
Bluestein is alleged to have specifically targeted retired or elderly potential investors by conducting numerous “investment seminars” in Michigan and California through his firm Maximum Financial, to lure them into investing large sums into E-M securities.
The SEC says Bluestein gained the trust of potential investors by discussing generic financial planning topics and investment products at the seminars. Then under the guise of informal conversations, he generated talk among attendees who had already invested in E-M by asking whether they had received their "Edward May checks."
The SEC says Bluestein misrepresented these investments as low risk and falsely assured investors he had conducted due diligence work as to E-M’s legitimacy. He is also alleged to have failed to inform investors of his own compensation package, through which he received $2.4 million in undisclosed commissions from May, in addition to $1.4 million in disclosed compensation he received from investor funds.
Bluestein’s alleged fraud is the latest in a string of Ponzi-related allegations since Bernard Madoff’s $65 billion swindle surfaced last December. Within the past month two men were charged in New York with an $80 million Ponzi scheme based on an automated teller machine business; a former Nebraska police officer admitted running a $4 million Ponzi based on sports outings and products; and an Oregon woman was sentenced to five years in prison for a $2 million Ponzi purportedly involved in foreign exchange trading.
The volume of frauds has kept the SEC increasingly busy since its initial embarrassment over being caught ‘asleep at the wheel’ by the Madoff scandal.
“There’s a significant increase in Ponzi scheme cases this year. From our perspective, size isn't important,” says Scott Friestad, associate director of the SEC’s enforcement division. “We're aggressively pursuing Ponzi schemes regardless of size, because the sad truth is that, for those caught up in them, they're losing most if not all of their money.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
StanChart: UK, EU should copy US 'commercial' Basel III
Isda AGM: exec warns divergent Basel III rules will push trading into less-regulated entities
NBFI oversight ‘no longer adequate’, say BdF economists
Researchers call for stronger supervision of non-bank sector ‘before risks actually materialise’
Why Brexit still stirs up trouble for cross-border business
As EU erects another obstacle, banks consider ways around it – or exit strategies
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing