FSA confirms remuneration code of practice
The UK regulator has published its financial pay code of practice into its handbook
LONDON - A remuneration code of practice has been confirmed for the UK financial services industry today, as the Financial Services Authority (FSA) added its financial pay guidelines into its regulatory handbook.
The FSA said it was including the code of conduct into its handbook now so that the large banks, building societies and broker dealers could put into place the recommendations in time for their planning for 2010.
The code is designed to ensure firms establish, implement and maintain remuneration policies that are consistent with effective risk management, in response to criticisms that many firms operated incentivisation far out of kilter with risk-based metrics.
Firms are now required to provide the regulator with a remuneration policy statement before November, signed off by a remuneration committee checking compliance with the code. A press release from the regulator stated: "Non-compliant firms could face enforcement action or ultimately, be forced to hold additional capital should they pursue risky processes."
The standards are, the FSA says, concentrated on two objectives: firstly, to compel boards to pay enough attention to whether their pay policies are risk-based and sustainable; and secondly, that individual pay packages incentivise correctly.
The FSA says its code makes clear that firms must not enter into employee contracts offering guaranteed bonuses for over one year, and also that two thirds of bonuses for senior employees will be spread over three years.
The regulator reassures firms that the code is designed to limit damage to their competitiveness in global markets and is similar to proposals being discussed by EU and Swiss regulators, and in line with high-level principles agreed at the G-20 and published by the Financial Stability Forum, now the Financial Stability Board (FSB).
"While there is general international agreement on the need for supervisory action on remuneration policies and practices, we will be the first major financial regulator to take this step," said Hector Sants, chief executive of the FSA.
The UK rules come shortly after the US House of Representatives passed an executive compensation bill on July 31 that will provide far greater regulatory oversight of top-level pay at US financial institutions, as well as increase shareholder voting powers on remuneration decisions.
The FSA has published a policy statement "Reforming remuneration practices in financial services" as feedback on CP09/10, which can be read here.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
AI governance rules coming soon, says CFTC chair
Selig doesn’t want to stifle innovation, but says trading or advice algos will need guardrails
For Esma the supervisor, people power will be prime
Industry hopes to avoid people risk during transition, with help from national authorities
Basel III endgame: overall relief hides winners and losers
G-Sibs gain from surcharge reform while AOCI hits regional banks
One thing missing from US Basel III proposal: a deadline
Without a deadline, risk teams will struggle to secure resources to begin implementation projects
In simplifying credit risk models, EBA could compound capital costs
Skipping hard yards of internal ratings-based approach might trip higher capital charges and implementation costs
Change fatigue could dim EBA’s credit risk simplicity drive
Revisions may be kept to a minimum as short-term implementation burden weighs on banks
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules